Archive for the ‘International Policy’ Category

Companies, stakeholders move on climate change

September 22nd, 2011
Posted by Juliette Terzieff

United Nations backed negotiations to forge an international treaty to fight global warming may be stumbling, but that hasn’t prevented companies around the world from taking steps to address climate change risks on their own and with the help of stakeholders. For the first time in the ten years since Carbon Disclosure Project began its annual Global 500 report, results show a majority of companies including climate change concerns and actions in their business planning.

The CDP report, Accelerating low carbon growth, found 68 percent of the 396 companies analyzed have climate change strategies, up from 48 percent a year ago. The percentage of companies reporting on greenhouse gas emission reductions also jumped from 19 percent to 45 percent over the same period.

Seventy four percent of respondents reported having a carbon reduction target in place, with Consumer Staples as the industry with the highest percentage and Energy with the lowest proportion.

CDP also looked at indications of financial benefits of corporate climate change efforts and found companies that have climate change strategies earned nearly twice the return for their investors than those that do not between 2005 and 2011.

“The improved financial performance of companies with high carbon performance is a clear indicator that it makes good business sense to manage and reduce carbon emissions. This is a win win for business – the short ROIs many emissions reducing activities have, can help increase profitability,” CDP CEP Paul Simpson said. “Companies yet to take action on climate change will have to work hard to remain competitive as we head towards an increasingly resourced constrained, low carbon economy.”

The top ten performers in terms of performance and disclosure according to the report are (in alphabetical order) Bank of America, Bayer, BMW, Cisco, Honda Motor Company, Philips Electronics, SAP, Sony Corporation, Tesco and Westpac Banking Corporation.

Measures taken by corporations surveyed in the report range from monetary incentives to employees to reduce their own environmental impact, energy efficient changes to working spaces and production processes, product design and low carbon energy installations. Changes in practice, such as minimizing business travel through the use of new technological capabilities like telepresence, have exploded across the globe.

The CDP’s S&P 500 annual report on American corporations found similar results, with the percentage of companies reporting climate change strategy as policy jumping from 35 percent in 2010 to 65 percent in 2011.

United Nations authorities are also moving forward with climate change battle plans, working to leverage the power of technology to help countries mitigate and adapt to the effects of global warming.

The world body’s Technology Executive Committee held its’ first working meeting this month to begin examining how it will manage policy and technical issues related to technology transfer as the policy arm of the Technology Mechanism. The process was established at the last climate summit in Cancun as a means to aid developing countries protect vulnerable populations and work towards the creation of sustainable futures.

“The goal of the Technology Mechanism can only be achieved through a wider and deeper collaboration among all countries with the active engagement of relevant stakeholders, including the research

community, academia and, importantly, the private sector,” Christiana Figueres, head of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, said after the meeting.

The Committee will be looking at ways to increase information sharing on emerging technologies and engaging stakeholders to advance the process.

Continued action from the private sector and its’ stakeholders remains crucial as governments struggle to align around a binding international climate treaty. Climate negotiators from around the world are looking to minimize expectations for progress at the next UN sponsored climate summit beginning at the end of November in Durban, South Africa, and few expect a successor agreement to the Kyoto Treaty to be part of the meeting’s outcome.

Permalink

Charting the Digital Planet Revolution

July 28th, 2011
Posted by Juliette Terzieff

The world is changing. A revolution is underway. Driven by a family of technologies that can erase barriers associated with time and distance or raise an individual voice instantaneously onto a global platform, people, organizations and governments around the world are embracing the potential changes this digital revolution can produce. Future 500’s new Tech Planet Journal initiative works to chronicle and shape positive development with broad stakeholder support.

It seems like every day there are news stories from around the world on a dizzying array of topics associated with how the Internet, broadband, microchips and software are changing the way we live and work…

Social media has become more than an outlet to discuss favorite recipes or weekend plans with friends.

Twitter, Facebook, YouTube have become tools of the pro-reform masses across the Middle East, Asia and North Africa. When natural disaster strikes millions the world round turn to those same tools for damage assessments, missing persons’ pleas and donation drives.

Humanitarian agencies and NGOs have begun to look at incorporating Internet-based solutions driven by volunteer communities such as Ushahidi, CrisisMappers and OneStreetMap into existing systems of global humanitarian response. Western governments are providing millions of dollars in funding to support technological fixes to help dissenters sidestep government censorship of the Internet and restrictions to access.

Mobile telephones are evolving into more than just a replacement for traditional rotary phones – morphing into a valuable asset that overcomes infrastructure gaps in the developing world.

Across Africa mobile banking has opened up economic opportunities for the urban poor, women and agricultural communities. Farmers in Asia, the Middle East and Africa are able to avoid some of the worst climate change effects by tapping into mobile solutions to get information on weather patterns.

The field of mHealth is exploding with a huge percentage of development focused on using mobile phones to diagnose, track and deliver care. The drive to improve maternal and child health worldwide continues to draw particular focus.

If it seem like a lot, that’s because it is…and actors worldwide – whether they be individual entrepreneurs, NGOs, companies or governments – are innovating and driving additional applications every single day.

Not every innovation will solve the problem it sets out to address. Not every government embraces technology. Not every community welcomes to the openness, and scrutiny, that comes with access.

These are opportunities and challenges the world will need to address as we move through the 21st century.

The Future 500’s new Tech Planet Journal initiative is working to track and shape the revolution – in part by providing a website clearing house of case studies, organizations, tools, services, and reports that document the current and potential impacts of digital technologies on sustainability, prosperity, and democracy.

Come visit the new Tech Planet Journal site…and let us know what you think.

Permalink

Cutting Criticism of Forest Protection Effort

July 26th, 2011
Posted by Juliette Terzieff

Environmental and human rights watchdogs often levy criticism against governments and corporations for failing to live up to socially responsibility commitments. But this week Global Witness released a report on the World Wildlife Fund’s Global Forest & Trade Network (GFTN) initiative highly critical of failures to adequately screen participating companies for illegal timber and habitat destruction activities.

Global Witness’ report Pandering to the Loggers claims that companies associated the GFTN are using WFF association to bolster environmental credibility while continuing to contribute to the destruction of forests and trade in illegally sourced timber. The report names Malaysian logging company Ta Ann Holdings Berhad, British building supplier Jewson and the Swiss-German timber company Danzer Group as GFTN members involved in human rights abuses or environmental degradation of forests.

“WWF should publicly disassociate itself from any company using timber from illegal or unethical sources. It’s shocking that one of the world’s most trusted conservation groups deems it acceptable to take money from such companies. This investigation raises bigger questions about the underlying strategy and efficacy of such voluntary schemes,” Global Witness Forest Campaign Leader Tom Picken said.

The report’s authors noted that producing a report so critical of another NGO stakeholder that is involved in promoting solutions to some of the world’s most pressing environmental and human rights issues was a difficult decision. But because the GFTN receives public funds and current strategies to combat deforestation are insufficient, publication of the report went ahead.

The GFTN works to link environmentally responsible producers, suppliers and buyers committed to forest protection through sustainable forest management, supply chain transparency, and product certifications. Over 270 entities – including major international brands Avon, Hewlett-Packard, Kimberly-Clark and Marks & Spencer — representing annual trade in wood and forest-sourced products worth $45.2 billion participate in the 20-year old program.

Global Witness said the network lacks transparency, a system for independent evaluations, and monitoring or enforcement mechanisms, and that membership rules are simply inadequate to prevent abuses. The organization has called for an independent assessment of GFTN rules and effects on the world’s forests.

GFTN officials were quick to respond to the Global Witness allegations by highlighting the network’s contribution to creating a multi-sector standard for responsible purchasing and credible product certification.

“GFTN creates market conditions that help conserve the world’s forests, while providing social and economic benefits for the businesses and people that depend on them,” GFTN head George White said in response to the Global Witness report.

“Of course, some GFTN partners have a way to go on their journey to sustainability. But these are precisely the companies that should be in GFTN, and we applaud their commitments to improving their environmental performance. Companies caught flouting the rules and spirit of GFTN will be removed from the network.”

Destruction of the world’s forests and the long-term environmental implications have united a broad array of stakeholders in efforts to slow the pace of deforestation. The United Nations General Assembly declared 2001 the International Year of Forests noting that 1.6 billion people depend on forests for their livelihoods and that 80% of the world’s biodiversity is housed in forests.

The overall rates of annual global deforestation dropped from 16 million hectares in the 1990s to 13 million between 200 and 2010 according to the UN Food & Agriculture Organization, but the amount of primary forest – areas untouched by human activity – continues to decline.

Efforts to build on forest protection efforts will ultimately be most successful with the inclusion of private sector actors who help manage local, national and global marketplaces’ demand for forest products. The reality that not all companies are able or willing to shift over to sustainable practices should not erode support for efforts such as the GFTN.

Permalink

Watts, Water and the power of a Billion Chinese Jump

March 28th, 2011

From Pua Mench, Director of Stakeholder Engagement, Asia:

At a recent talk Jonathan Watts, Asia environment correspondent for The Guardian and author of “When a Billion Chinese Jump: How China will Save Mankind – Or Destroy It”, gave disturbing summary of China’s environmental performance – and expressed hope for our collective future.

Watts’ book provides a poignant and informative glimpse into China’s deteriorating environment, from Yunnan Province to Inner Mongolia, which Watts playfully describes as a guide of places not to go. Watts, who is based in Beijing and has spent the past seven years in China, is frank but fair when describing the situation in China. He gives cautious praise to the country’s 12th Five-Year Plan, released in March 14, 2011 and says he is encouraged by the plan, which for the first time ever slightly reduces the pace of economic growth and expands the list of pollution targets. “Government is starting to recognize that there are finite limits on how far you can push the environment,” says Watts. But it remains to be seen whether or not government efforts will improve the situation.

Until a river expedition in search of the Baiji, or Yangtze River Dolphin – one of only five freshwater dolphin species in the world – Watts said he assumed that when mankind wholeheartedly turns his attention to problems he could fix them. The Baiji expedition represented such efforts. Well funded and with cutting edge technology and a leading team of scientists, the journey was forecast to be a success, yet not a single dolphin was found. At the trip’s end a creature that had been on earth for twenty million years was declared functionally extinct, most likely due to environmental stress caused by pollution, river traffic, dams and illegal fishing. Watts regards that story as the most important one he’ll ever write, one that powerfully illustrates the limits of human capability and irreversible and grave consequences of our actions.

In response to the apparent demise of the Baiji, Indian authorities announced plans earlier this year to make extraordinary efforts to save the country’s remaining population of the endangered Ganges river dolphin – of which authorities estimate less than 3,000 remain in the wild. 

Unfortunately, the deeper meaning behind tragedies like the demise of the Baiji is often lost, especially in China where 300 million people live without access to clean water supplies. “Water quality and quantity is by far the biggest concern in China,” says to Watts. Fifty percent of China’s water is not fit for human consumption and another third to a quarter is not fit for any use whatsoever, according to Ministry of Environmental Protection research. Air pollution and carbon dioxide emissions, largely stemming from coal-fired power plants, are also a huge problem in China, which over took the United States in 2007 to become the world’s biggest carbon dioxide emitter. Even with slightly lowered GDP growth targets, the country’s energy demands are set to skyrocket in the coming decades.

As Watts’ colleague Isabel Hilton noted:

The west invented unsustainable living; China has taken it up with enthusiasm.

We are barely three decades in to China’s industrial and consumption revolution. There are still hundreds of millions of poor Chinese who wish to prosper and consume in a country that wastes so much energy that its average per capita carbon emissions already equal those of France. The most worrying thing about the Chinese industrial revolution is not even the appalling damage that Watts meticulously chronicles, but the capacity for more that is still in the system.

“The good news is that government gets it,” says Watts, and is sincere because they are facing severe environmental crises and cannot avoid addressing them. But the solutions that are being put forth are engineered supply side solutions, like the massive South to North Water Transfer Project, which in many ways exhibits the same hubris as the expedition to save the Baiji.

China is now the world’s largest manufacturer of wind turbines and solar panels. Authorities aim for renewable sources to account for 8% of China’s energy supply by 2020. And even with the increase, two-thirds of Chinas’ energy supply will still come from coal (the remaining from nuclear and hydropower sources).

China has made huge investments in the clean tech sector (in fact, it was the country with the highest level of investment in the world in 2009) yet renewables will continue to represent just a fraction of China’s largely coal dominated energy mix.

Such investment and development strategies are ultimately band-aids to the underlying and much bigger problem identified by Watts, Western style consumption habits, which have readily been adopted by the Chinese. More consumption means greater energy and water demands, increased pollution, growing carbon dioxide emissions and fewer and fewer natural resources. “We may be approaching ecological limits to economic growth,” asserts Watts. “We [humans] resemble a swarm of locusts.” Pollution is not the biggest problem, because you can deal with pollution, what you cannot deal with is mankind’s widening appetite for “stuff” which is pushing the environment to its limits.

One of the constant arguments put forth by developing countries, particularly in relation to carbon emissions, is that they should be allowed to grow their economies without restrictions, just as developed countries did—the “develop now and clean up later” model. But this logic loses sight of the fact that we share one planet and finite resources. There may come a point in time at which the environment simply cannot support global consumption patterns. China, home to 1.3 billion people and “the world’s factory” is reaching that point. The extinction of the 20 million year old Baiji should serve as a cautionary tale of what happens when you push the environment beyond its healthy limits.

Permalink

Consumerism vs. Conservation – Is the Verdict in?

March 24th, 2010
From Juliette Terzieff, Senior Director, Global Stakeholder Initiatives:

It’s been a strange week for conservation efforts at the Conference on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES). Pessimists may argue world leaders have clearly demonstrated their lack of concern for our friends in the plant and animal kingdoms. Optimists will say some progress is better than none.

Either way you want to look at it, economic concerns have dominated the event with coral, sharks, polar bears, and Atlantic bluefin tuna among the species that failed to win protection support from delegates.

(more…)

Permalink

Politics as Usual Leaves America Behind in the Global Climate Debate

January 18th, 2010
From Danna Moore, our Stakeholder Campaigns Director:

Americans are less supportive of climate change action than people in other countries. This disconnect makes it unlikely the U.S. will pass meaningful policy before the next international meeting and American politicians need to assume more of a leadership role.

It is clear that worldwide support for serious action on climate change remains robust even during a global recession.  A recent Globescan Survey polled over 24,000 individuals in 23 countries and found that 64% of people think climate change is a “very serious” problem, up from 44% of those polled in 1998. 

Sadly, Americans ranked below the average with 45%, a decrease from 50% in 2007. This has left the scientific and environmental community confused on the next steps towards addressing climate change in the United States. Scientists find they must, once again, expend time and resources to fight climate change skepticism rather than focus on the political solutions that are desperately needed.

(more…)

Permalink

Copenhagen Fails: Let the Blame Game Begin

December 31st, 2009
From Danna Moore, our Stakeholder Campaigns Director:

As widely predicted, the Copenhagen summit did not produce a binding, fair or efficient global climate treaty.  And yet, politicians, environmentalists, and activists seem genuinely shocked at the outcome. 

Post failure, the global community is quickly pointing fingers, particularly at the Obama Administration.  Bill McKibben, founder of 350.org and an emerging global leader in the climate change movement, particularly slammed Obama saying, “The president has wrecked the UN and he’s wrecked the possibility of a tough plan to control global warming.”  

(more…)

Permalink