Archive for the ‘Climate’ Category

Is telepresence the next ICT business revolution?

May 31st, 2011
 Posted by Future 500 Senior Director, Juliette Terzieff:

 

Telepresence is quickly emerging as a business solution to trim costs, improve energy efficiency and slash carbon emissions. The use of telepresence meetings cuts travel related emissions and in the case of developing countries that don’t yet have the same kind of infrastructure as fully industrialized nations can provide a way leapfrog over some development issues that would drive environmental stress.

Companies across a wide variety of industries, including telecommunications, retail, financial services, healthcare and oil and gas, are already turning to telepresence solutions to meet a variety of operating needs. Telepresence is winning support from executives worldwide over video conferencing technologies because of increased reliability, security enhancements and a more immersive overall experience.

In late 2010, AT&T and BT announced the pairing of their telepresence networks allowing clients of the two telecommunications groups to schedule meetings and connect with users on either network. The two –which operate the world’s largest telepresence networks –operate over 2,000 telepresence rooms worldwide including 1,100 corporate clients. Many ICT and telecommunication industry observers predict this collaboration may set the global standard for telepresence services.

U.K.-based BCS Global Networks Limited, which offers companies video conference and other services worldwide, also operates a network of public videoconferencing and telepresence rooms for business travelers to help them connect globally. In India, Gurgaon-based Business Octane recently ramped up its telepresence capabilities for the market to enable connections of up to 40 locations and 600 people at any one time. The company –which is eying the government sector and large enterprises as clientele –hopes to take their platform global.

The possible effects of a telepresence revolution are astounding. A single company using four telepresence rooms can shave off over 2,200 metric tons of carbon emissions in a five year period, the equivalent of the emissions from 400 passenger vehicles, according to a recently released Verdantix study commissioned by the Carbon Disclosure product and supported by AT&T. Growth in the use of telepresence and videoconferencing could help large U.S. and U.K.-based corporations with revenues over $1 billion to slash around 5.5 billion metric tons of carbon emissions by 2020.

Increased use of telepresence technology also boasts other benefits for companies –such as expenditure reductions, increased employee productivity and more rapid decision making capabilities, the report says.

A recent study from the World Wildlife Fund-UK took a look at air and business travel, and British corporations’ views on emissions cutting measures. Aviation is one of the UK’s largest and fastest growing contributors to carbon emissions –increasing 3 percent annually, according to the report, Travelling Light. Business travel accounts for 25 percent of British passenger trips.

WWF-UK found that over 80 percent of companies have or are planning reductions in their business travel, and that 85 percent believe videoconferencing has an integral role to play in achieving their reduction goals.

Developing economies like China and India are some of the world’s largest contributors to carbon gas emissions. One of the major hurdles hampering efforts to forge a binding international treaty to fight climate change when the Kyoto Treaty expires in 2012 is the insistence by developing countries that they should not be hamstrung in their efforts to develop infrastructure –which increases emissions – when industrialized countries did so freely in decades past. Technologies such as telepresence are touted by supporters as giving developing countries the ability to leapfrog past some infrastructure development that contributes to environmental degradation and climate change.

Permalink

ITU boosts e-waste, climate battle efforts

May 14th, 2011
Posted by Senior Director, Juliette Terzieff:

Stakeholders across the spectrum are responding to predictions of massive growth in e-waste and the detrimental effects discarded electronic devices have in the developing world. Major national and international telecommunications firms, for example, committed to developing the first industry standard universal charger to promote efficiency and aid in the battle against climate change, the United Nation’s International Telecommunications Industry (ITU) announced this week.

The new charger upgrades a 2009 universal battery charging system decision by the ITU that eliminates the need for individual chargers for products sold by different manufacturers. This will eliminate the need for manufacturers to sell chargers with each new phone.

With this week’s decision, the ITU expanded the reach of the universal charger to cover cameras, GPS systems, headphones and other lower-power devices. The new chargers will use faster charging currents to reduce charging tomes, and also feature a detachable cable with standardized connectors to allow data transfer. These additions will reduce the number of cords needed, decrease production energy consumption and ultimately impact the amount of waste generated by the industry. ITU officials expect manufacturers to roll out the chargers –which will be produced with eco-friendly materials – by the billions over the next few years.

“Other standards claim to be universal and energy efficient, but only ITU’s solution is truly universal and a real step forward in addressing environmental and climate change issues,” ITU Secretary-General Hamadoun Toure said after the decision. “This updated standard will bring the benefits of the universal charger to a wider range of devices and consumers… The environmental impact of wide adoption will be enormous.”

Several major industry players have already committed to the new system, including AT&T, France Telecom-Orange, Swisscom, Telecom Italia and the China Academy of Telecommunication Research. The Geneva-based ITU works with 192 governments and over 700 private sector entities to set industry standards.

Buy-in from industry players operating or based in high usage growth regions like Asia and Africa is paramount for the broadest impact. In China, for example, the growth of the middle class over the last decade has catapulted demand for electronics while domestic energy consumption levels have risen dramatically.

The new standard meets requirements of the Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal –known more commonly as simply the Basel Convention –according to the ITU.

E-waste –the collective name for discarded or scrap electronics like television, cellular telephones, refrigerators and computers –remains a major campaign focal point for influential stakeholders such as Basel Action Network, Greenpeace International and the Campaign for Recycling.

The world produces around 40 billion metric tons of e-waste every year –with hundreds of millions of tons making their way to landfills in places like China, Nigeria and India. The components contain toxins and heavy metals like mercury and lead which leak into nearby soil and water supplies, and endanger the health of impoverished workers picking through landfills for components to sell.

In late 2010, the United Nations released a report with stark warnings about the growth rate of e-waste in developing countries. India will see a 500% growth in the amount of e-waste in its’ landfills over the next decade, while China and South Africa will see 400% increases over their 2007 levels in the next ten years. The bulk of the waste will not originate in those countries but come from abroad, predominantly the U.S.

Multi-stakeholder initiatives in the U.S. and internationally are looking to address the need for better recycling and waste processing. Companies including Samsung, Capital One, Bank of America and the Apollo Group have signed up as Basel Action Network e-Stewards committing to support the group’s rigorous certification process for responsible electronics recycling. In April 2011 the Consumer Electronics Association pledged to triple recycling rates in the U.S. for e-waste by 2016, to equal one billion pounds of electronics annually, through a combination of public education projects, infrastructure building and recycling enhancement. The industry group’s eCycling Leadership Initiative will look to build national recycling standards to enhance different state-level policies.

Permalink

Watts, Water and the power of a Billion Chinese Jump

March 28th, 2011

From Pua Mench, Director of Stakeholder Engagement, Asia:

At a recent talk Jonathan Watts, Asia environment correspondent for The Guardian and author of “When a Billion Chinese Jump: How China will Save Mankind – Or Destroy It”, gave disturbing summary of China’s environmental performance – and expressed hope for our collective future.

Watts’ book provides a poignant and informative glimpse into China’s deteriorating environment, from Yunnan Province to Inner Mongolia, which Watts playfully describes as a guide of places not to go. Watts, who is based in Beijing and has spent the past seven years in China, is frank but fair when describing the situation in China. He gives cautious praise to the country’s 12th Five-Year Plan, released in March 14, 2011 and says he is encouraged by the plan, which for the first time ever slightly reduces the pace of economic growth and expands the list of pollution targets. “Government is starting to recognize that there are finite limits on how far you can push the environment,” says Watts. But it remains to be seen whether or not government efforts will improve the situation.

Until a river expedition in search of the Baiji, or Yangtze River Dolphin – one of only five freshwater dolphin species in the world – Watts said he assumed that when mankind wholeheartedly turns his attention to problems he could fix them. The Baiji expedition represented such efforts. Well funded and with cutting edge technology and a leading team of scientists, the journey was forecast to be a success, yet not a single dolphin was found. At the trip’s end a creature that had been on earth for twenty million years was declared functionally extinct, most likely due to environmental stress caused by pollution, river traffic, dams and illegal fishing. Watts regards that story as the most important one he’ll ever write, one that powerfully illustrates the limits of human capability and irreversible and grave consequences of our actions.

In response to the apparent demise of the Baiji, Indian authorities announced plans earlier this year to make extraordinary efforts to save the country’s remaining population of the endangered Ganges river dolphin – of which authorities estimate less than 3,000 remain in the wild. 

Unfortunately, the deeper meaning behind tragedies like the demise of the Baiji is often lost, especially in China where 300 million people live without access to clean water supplies. “Water quality and quantity is by far the biggest concern in China,” says to Watts. Fifty percent of China’s water is not fit for human consumption and another third to a quarter is not fit for any use whatsoever, according to Ministry of Environmental Protection research. Air pollution and carbon dioxide emissions, largely stemming from coal-fired power plants, are also a huge problem in China, which over took the United States in 2007 to become the world’s biggest carbon dioxide emitter. Even with slightly lowered GDP growth targets, the country’s energy demands are set to skyrocket in the coming decades.

As Watts’ colleague Isabel Hilton noted:

The west invented unsustainable living; China has taken it up with enthusiasm.

We are barely three decades in to China’s industrial and consumption revolution. There are still hundreds of millions of poor Chinese who wish to prosper and consume in a country that wastes so much energy that its average per capita carbon emissions already equal those of France. The most worrying thing about the Chinese industrial revolution is not even the appalling damage that Watts meticulously chronicles, but the capacity for more that is still in the system.

“The good news is that government gets it,” says Watts, and is sincere because they are facing severe environmental crises and cannot avoid addressing them. But the solutions that are being put forth are engineered supply side solutions, like the massive South to North Water Transfer Project, which in many ways exhibits the same hubris as the expedition to save the Baiji.

China is now the world’s largest manufacturer of wind turbines and solar panels. Authorities aim for renewable sources to account for 8% of China’s energy supply by 2020. And even with the increase, two-thirds of Chinas’ energy supply will still come from coal (the remaining from nuclear and hydropower sources).

China has made huge investments in the clean tech sector (in fact, it was the country with the highest level of investment in the world in 2009) yet renewables will continue to represent just a fraction of China’s largely coal dominated energy mix.

Such investment and development strategies are ultimately band-aids to the underlying and much bigger problem identified by Watts, Western style consumption habits, which have readily been adopted by the Chinese. More consumption means greater energy and water demands, increased pollution, growing carbon dioxide emissions and fewer and fewer natural resources. “We may be approaching ecological limits to economic growth,” asserts Watts. “We [humans] resemble a swarm of locusts.” Pollution is not the biggest problem, because you can deal with pollution, what you cannot deal with is mankind’s widening appetite for “stuff” which is pushing the environment to its limits.

One of the constant arguments put forth by developing countries, particularly in relation to carbon emissions, is that they should be allowed to grow their economies without restrictions, just as developed countries did—the “develop now and clean up later” model. But this logic loses sight of the fact that we share one planet and finite resources. There may come a point in time at which the environment simply cannot support global consumption patterns. China, home to 1.3 billion people and “the world’s factory” is reaching that point. The extinction of the 20 million year old Baiji should serve as a cautionary tale of what happens when you push the environment beyond its healthy limits.

Permalink

Thoughts from the CSR Asia Summit

September 15th, 2010

Posted by Pua Mench, Future 500 Manager for Stakeholder Engagement – Asia

The 8th annual CSR Asia Summit kicked off Tuesday, Sept. 14 in Hong Kong, engaging 400 participants from 25 countries on an array of issues centered on “strategic solutions for sustainability.” Across Asia “CS-who?” is a common response when someone begins to raise sustainability issues to a corporate audience, so the sellout crowd here at the summit is an exciting signal of a growing profile for CSR issues.

There is a long way to go. Even in the very westernized and very wealthy Hong Kong, 86% of companies either do not know what CSR is or do not know what to do about it.  And as a fellow participant from Singapore shared with me later, that number is about the same in her country.

Mark Dickens, Head of Listing for the Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (HKex), suggested that cultural differences are part of the problem. Dickens says that the language used by people in the West to discuss CSR issues with Asia is often perceived as patronizing. He advocated more collaborative efforts as a way forward, for example engaging in conversations and sharing ideas, such as exemplified by the model of the Equator Principles. “A process of inclusion rather than preaching process makes a lot more sense,” said Dickens.

**********************

 

At a breakout session on the role of business in achieving the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) in Asia, UNICEF’s regional chief David Girling discussed progress in the region and business opportunities presented by the MDGs. Girling said there is untapped potential for private sector, particularly between now and 2015, as business can leverage government pressure to achieve the MDGs.

He offered a few exciting examples of business capitalizing on the MDGs—illustrating a point echoed throughout the day, “CSR is NOT about philanthropy.” For example, India’s Tata—a frontrunner on many levels, including CSR—has developed a low-cost water purifier targeted at low-income groups and rural markets, in an effort to both save the lives of millions who suffer from waterborne diseases and make a profit. The Vietnam-based International Development Enterprises (IDE) is helping to eradicate disease by providing commercial rural latrines. Girling said that innovation of this nature is a huge growth area.

Toby Ernberg, global corporate accounts manager of Vestergaard Frandsen, followed up on this idea, with examples of his company’s own ability to innovate. Vestergaard Frandsen develops products that save lives, are easy to use and long lasting. They are the leading producer of insecticide treated bed nets, the most effective known device for preventing malaria in the developing world. I was particularly impressed by Vestergaard Frandsen’s “Life Straw” product, which is aptly named as it looks exactly like a big straw, albeit much enhanced. The life straw filters up to 1,000 liters of water, removing most waterborne bacteria and parasites.

What I found particularly inspiring about Vestergaard Frandsen is that they adhere to strict CSR principles—they walk the walk, as was made obvious when Ernberg spoke with pride about the trip the entire staff took to Kenya to test the rural poor for AIDS and malaria and offer counseling, medicine and other helpful materials.

Ernberg’s last comment summed up the session nicely, and offered a powerful insight, “Most companies focus on just 10% of the population when developing products, whereas my company focuses on those 90% that need products.”

Note: For those companies wishing to learn more about the MDGs, and gain insight into their current impact/contribution, the Netherlands-based National Committee for International Cooperation and Sustainable Development has devised an online tool, the “MDG scan.” www.mdgscan.com/ 

**********************

 

In the afternoon discussion turned to climate change adaptation, not an entirely uplifting topic but a critical one none-the-less.

A two-pronged conversation emerged, the urgency for action coupled with the confusion among companies over what to do.

Dr. Glen Frommer, Head of Sustainability Department for Hong Kong’s MTR corporation, had this to offer to business, as a way to manage the risks presented by climate change, “As long as companies have a transparent, robust system in place, and trust is in place, they should move forward by taking it one step at a time.” ‘Do so with urgency’ was the silent caveat.

Frommer also encouraged participants to accelerate the realization that climate change will impact rich and poor alike. “What’s happening in Pakistan [the lethal flooding] is going to happen again and again. We are one people with one goal, and not much time to get there.”

I wrapped up the day participating in a discussion on innovative solutions for sustainable value chains. The moderator kicked the discussion off with an insightful remark, “Where the value chain stops is increasingly expanding.” Indeed.  We’re seeing this in China right now, where NGOs are increasingly scrutinizing MNCs’ supply chains, and holding them accountable for suppliers to the nth-tier.

For a company like Proctor and Gamble (the first to present), which has 75,000 suppliers, this is no easy task. One way they are tackling the issue is through their “supplier sustainability board,” which launched P&G’s “supplier environmental scorecard” in May 2010. P&G asks suppliers to report on carbon emissions, wastes and other environmental and social indicators. They also encourage suppliers to bring forward their innovations and ideas, which, if successful, are recognized and rewarded.

Permalink

Consumerism vs. Conservation – Is the Verdict in?

March 24th, 2010
From Juliette Terzieff, Senior Director, Global Stakeholder Initiatives:

It’s been a strange week for conservation efforts at the Conference on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES). Pessimists may argue world leaders have clearly demonstrated their lack of concern for our friends in the plant and animal kingdoms. Optimists will say some progress is better than none.

Either way you want to look at it, economic concerns have dominated the event with coral, sharks, polar bears, and Atlantic bluefin tuna among the species that failed to win protection support from delegates.

(more…)

Permalink

Light Amid the Darkness – an unanticipated discovery

March 9th, 2010
From Danna Moore, our Stakeholder Campaigns Director:

Over the years, I’ve worked, interned and volunteered in the activist community.  As a student and resident in San Francisco, it wasn’t difficult to find a highly-active grassroots network of organizations and individuals fighting against war, poverty and environmental degradation.  The progressive culture here is an inspiring and passionate bubble that creates a thirst for knowledge in the political and social sphere.

That progressive culture has led me to where I am today, a campaign organizer working on climate policy at a non-profit based out of SF.  When I first came to Future 500, it took me a while to fully understand the model.  The organization simultaneously works with both the activist community and (gasp) the corporate sector, searching for common ground opportunities. 

The interesting set of bedfellows we engage brings, not surprisingly, skepticism from both sectors, and elicits eye-opening reactions. 

(more…)

Permalink

Obama’s Hopes for the Future of Climate Policy

February 17th, 2010
From Danna Moore, our Stakeholder Campaigns Director:

Those who were skeptical about Obama’s seriousness on addressing climate change need worry no longer.

In his first State of the Union address on Jan. 27th Obama made a point of praising the House for passing the Waxman-Markey bill in June, a climate policy that would put a cap on carbon dioxide emissions and other greenhouse gases over the next 40 years. 

Obama also stressed the importance of federal legislation as a means to marry job creation and green technology, saying: “To create more of these clean energy jobs, we need more production, more efficiency, more incentives… And, yes, it means passing a comprehensive energy and climate bill.”

He called for Democrats and Republicans to work through their differences. The current cap and trade bill has been stagnated by its inability to gain enough votes in the Senate, mainly due to the lack of Republican support.

Environmental groups including NRDC and Sierra Club have been applauding Obama’s leadership on climate action while others, including Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth, express deep concerns with his plans to include dirty energy sources (oil, nuclear and coal). 

(more…)

Permalink

Time to end Bottle Battles and Waste Wars

February 10th, 2010
By Bill Shireman, Future500 President:

A FRAMEWORK FOR 21ST CENTURY RECYCLING AND SUSTAINABILITY

The greatest challenge facing the country is not war, ecological decline, or economic recession.  It is the cynical divisiveness and hate-mongering that ideologues on the left and right use to keep their true believers in separate corners of the ring, engaging for only a few minutes at a time to trade verbal punches before retreating to their safe havens.

Take a simple issue that shouldn’t be very heated:  recycling.  What a nice, friendly, happy solution recycling should be – it reduces climate, water, energy, and litter impacts.  Yet, since Oregon passed the nation’s first “bottle bill” over three decades ago, adversaries have been locked in battle, each side holding firmly to positions they first embraced when Lyndon Johnson was President. 

Now, however, this ideological Berlin Wall is beginning to come down.  After more than a generation of innovative recycling approaches in the U.S., Canada, Europe, and Asia, people on all sides are opening their minds to new, 21st Century ways of recycling.
(more…)

Permalink

Climate Turns Hot for Products and Packages

February 2nd, 2010
From Bill, Shireman, Future 500 President

It’s not quite a perfect storm – but several factors have converged that could drive a host of new fees on three types of products:  beverages, electronics, and packaging – in 2010 and 2011.

Whether the fees make good policy sense – or get to the root of the problems they are intended to address – depends on whether the diverse universe of supporters and opponents can actually work with one another, directly or indirectly.

(more…)

Permalink

Politics as Usual Leaves America Behind in the Global Climate Debate

January 18th, 2010
From Danna Moore, our Stakeholder Campaigns Director:

Americans are less supportive of climate change action than people in other countries. This disconnect makes it unlikely the U.S. will pass meaningful policy before the next international meeting and American politicians need to assume more of a leadership role.

It is clear that worldwide support for serious action on climate change remains robust even during a global recession.  A recent Globescan Survey polled over 24,000 individuals in 23 countries and found that 64% of people think climate change is a “very serious” problem, up from 44% of those polled in 1998. 

Sadly, Americans ranked below the average with 45%, a decrease from 50% in 2007. This has left the scientific and environmental community confused on the next steps towards addressing climate change in the United States. Scientists find they must, once again, expend time and resources to fight climate change skepticism rather than focus on the political solutions that are desperately needed.

(more…)

Permalink