Archive for the ‘Misc’ Category

Censorship fallout from the Arab Spring?

June 29th, 2011
Posted by Senior Director, Juliette Terzieff:

The use of Internet-based and other ICT tools to drive reform protest movements captured the imaginations of tech-savvy individuals across North Africa and the Middle East over the last year. Facebook, YouTube and Twitter helped drive street demonstrations in a dozen countries and secure international support for reform efforts around the world. But the trend has also drawn the attention of repressive governments and some within the ICT sector fear censorship battles may heat up in the aftermath of the Arab Spring.

Google Inc. Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt says his company fully expects to be the focus of disagreements with repressive regimes and fears Google employees may be at risk from detention and torture in some countries.

“I think this problem is going to get worse. The reason is that as the technology becomes more pervasive and as the citizenry becomes completely wired and the content gets localized to the language of the country, it becomes an issue like television,” Schmidt said at the Google-organized Dublin summit on militant violence this week.

“If you look at television in most of these countries, television is highly regulated because the leaders, partial dictators, half dictators or whatever you want to call them understand the power of television imagery to keep their citizenry in some bucket,” he continued.

Governments ramping up their efforts to shut down the information highway is something Internet service providers have been grappling with on and off for the last decade. Experience with China’s censorship efforts in particular has drawn significant attention. Yahoo! Inc. faced serious public backlash after its 2002 provision of user information led to the arrest, abuse and imprisonment of Wang Xiaoning.

Since then ICT sector players have clashed on and off with authorities in China, and elsewhere, as the tide of support for universal access has gained prominence. Both Google and Yahoo! are members of the multi-stakeholder Global Network Initiative, an effort to promote freedom of expression and privacy, and like other major ICT companies have initiated efforts to increase access to services in developing countries.

Earlier this month the United Nations affirmed its support of access to the Internet as a human right, with Special Rapporteur Frank La Rue issuing a report making the case for Internet access to enjoy the same legal protections under international standards as other methods of mass communications.

But the practical truth is that as long as authorities maintain control over networks and infrastructure, fully unhindered access to the Internet, its tools and information is still just dream for hundreds of millions of users worldwide.

The U.S. State Department confirmed shortly after the release of La Rue’s report that American authorities are investing millions to fund efforts to bypass government censorship through the use of “shadow” voice and digital communications networks that allow users to send information, according to the New York Times and other media. The benefit, say proponents of alternative networks, is that even in cases where dissidents can use circumvention technologies to sidestep censors, if authorities have slowed down network speeds users may still be unable to post most content.

A variety of innovative options are being considered – some of which sound like they could have come right out from Q’s workshop in a James Bond movie. Consider the following examples cited by the New York Times and other reports:

  • The suitcase project uses small wireless antennas and base stations disguised as suitcases, boxes or bags to help transform electronic devices like cellular telephones or laptop computers and build a wireless Internet network that is outside official control. If authorities seize a unit once a core network is established in an area the other stations will compensate.
  • U.S authorities are helping develop cellular telephone applications, or apps, such as the “panic button” which will erase a cellular telephone’s contact lists and emit an emergency signal to alert other activists.
  • Another idea seeks to build on the use of Bluetooth headsets, which Iranian dissidents have used to transmit data outside authorities’ control. Developers are looking to create a system that allows users to mark data so that when other trusted individuals come into range their mobile devices automatically get the transfer.

Until governments around the world cease efforts to restrict Internet access and the international community develops a legally enforceable mechanism to compel countries to comply, censorship circumvention efforts will remain at the forefront of the battle for fair, equitable universal global access.

Permalink

Disaster response goes viral

April 24th, 2011

 Posted by Senior Director Juliette Terzieff:

It was only a matter of an hour or so after the devastating Jan. 10, 2010 earthquake hit Haiti when the chatter on social media sites began to hit a fever pitch. On Facebook, blogs and Twitter individual users rallied their friends to spread the word and get involved. In less than 24 hours I was able to write a blog post with a robust list of places where people could reach out helping hands to the people of Haiti using their cellular telephones or computers. Over the ensuing days and weeks efforts increased  — ways to help loved ones locate each other, mapping of affected areas, appeals for aid – and in each case the Internet was used as a way to spread news quickly.

It was amazing. For many social media fans it was the first time we realized the true tangible power users can wield on an international level. For the disaster response community it was a pivotal turning point. Proof positive that ICT tools wielded by individuals can influence the way the international community responds in cases of dire humanitarian need.

In the last year volunteer and technical communities (V&TCs) such as Ushahidi, OpenStreetMap and CrisisMappers have used their skills to help address humanitarian issues associated with natural disasters in Pakistan and Japan, and political crises in Libya and Egypt. They are quickly becoming essential tools for humanitarian crisis response.

“Haiti was a tipping point,” says Adele Waugaman, head of the United Nations Foundation and Vodafone Foundation Technology Partnership that invests in mobile technology applications to promote UN health and disaster relief efforts.

“The tools were there but had not been used at that scale and the Haiti disaster showed the possibilities for a change in the way plans unfold and mounting more proactive humanitarian responses.”

The humanitarian community has long been plugged into ways in which the ICT sector can aid response efforts. The ability of field responders in some of the world’s most inhospitable environs to leverage satellite feed to access the Internet and exchange information with regional offices and headquarters has already revolutionized the way aid operations unfold.

The addition of volunteer crisis mappers though brings the relationship between ICT tools and humanitarian response to an entirely new level.

“I think what we’re seeing is the rise of a “mapping reflex”, sort of like a “Wikipedia effect” where people decide to contribute to online Wikipedia entries…people don’t just Tweet and share YouTube pictures, they start creating maps. So international organizations are starting to take note and realize the value that these maps can have,” says Patrick Meier, Director of Crisis Mapping & New Media at Ushahidi and co-founder of CrisisMappers.

Stakeholders from across the public and private spectrum are examining ways to make crowd-sourced data an effective and standard tool in disaster response. The starting point? Haiti.

******************

 

Using handheld GPS technology volunteers fed information to other volunteers in front of computer screens around the world to collect, aggregate and map pleas for help from Haiti. Their efforts to combine mobile platforms, statistical modeling, geospatial technologies, and visual analytics helped close an information gap for aid responders who arrived in Haiti to find a drastically altered landscape. Local capacity was decimated, records destroyed. Destruction was so severe neighborhoods were unrecognizable. Immediate, desperate need filled every rubble-covered street.  

“To coordinate response within the UN system you need to know ‘who, what, where’ and in Haiti the baseline data was gone – locations and numbers of hospitals, schools, etc. That kind of information traditionally takes a lot of time to create, now it can be done in hours,” says Waugaman.

The UNF-Vodafone partnership, in conjunction with the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), commissioned the Harvard Humanitarian Initiative to explore how to align crisis mapping and existing disaster response systems into a systemic standard that can accelerate the entire process in a replicable manner.

The report, Disaster 2.0, looks at the lessons learned during the Haiti response and recommends ways to coordinate efforts between the two communities.  Forging a new system, the authors say, will require challenging the status quo and they recommend creating a neutral forum to assess areas of alignment and conflict, a rapid response team to implement practices supplied by V&TCs, a joint research and training effort, and an operational interface to promote coordination.

******************

 

Integration of crisis mapping into official channels of humanitarian disaster response is just in its beginning stages. Supporters are already looking at ways to overcome some of the challenges to creating a revised system of disaster response such as creating a tier of people who understand the way the humanitarian system operates and ways in which to verify the information being received from multiple sources during a disaster scenario.

The goal is to create an existing system that can be deployed rapidly to answer need anywhere around the world.

“The tools are just that, tools that can be used in a variety of ways to support the UN and humanitarian efforts to meet needs wherever and whenever,” explains Waugaman, “regardless of whether the cause is natural, political or otherwise.”

Permalink

Watts, Water and the power of a Billion Chinese Jump

March 28th, 2011

From Pua Mench, Director of Stakeholder Engagement, Asia:

At a recent talk Jonathan Watts, Asia environment correspondent for The Guardian and author of “When a Billion Chinese Jump: How China will Save Mankind – Or Destroy It”, gave disturbing summary of China’s environmental performance – and expressed hope for our collective future.

Watts’ book provides a poignant and informative glimpse into China’s deteriorating environment, from Yunnan Province to Inner Mongolia, which Watts playfully describes as a guide of places not to go. Watts, who is based in Beijing and has spent the past seven years in China, is frank but fair when describing the situation in China. He gives cautious praise to the country’s 12th Five-Year Plan, released in March 14, 2011 and says he is encouraged by the plan, which for the first time ever slightly reduces the pace of economic growth and expands the list of pollution targets. “Government is starting to recognize that there are finite limits on how far you can push the environment,” says Watts. But it remains to be seen whether or not government efforts will improve the situation.

Until a river expedition in search of the Baiji, or Yangtze River Dolphin – one of only five freshwater dolphin species in the world – Watts said he assumed that when mankind wholeheartedly turns his attention to problems he could fix them. The Baiji expedition represented such efforts. Well funded and with cutting edge technology and a leading team of scientists, the journey was forecast to be a success, yet not a single dolphin was found. At the trip’s end a creature that had been on earth for twenty million years was declared functionally extinct, most likely due to environmental stress caused by pollution, river traffic, dams and illegal fishing. Watts regards that story as the most important one he’ll ever write, one that powerfully illustrates the limits of human capability and irreversible and grave consequences of our actions.

In response to the apparent demise of the Baiji, Indian authorities announced plans earlier this year to make extraordinary efforts to save the country’s remaining population of the endangered Ganges river dolphin – of which authorities estimate less than 3,000 remain in the wild. 

Unfortunately, the deeper meaning behind tragedies like the demise of the Baiji is often lost, especially in China where 300 million people live without access to clean water supplies. “Water quality and quantity is by far the biggest concern in China,” says to Watts. Fifty percent of China’s water is not fit for human consumption and another third to a quarter is not fit for any use whatsoever, according to Ministry of Environmental Protection research. Air pollution and carbon dioxide emissions, largely stemming from coal-fired power plants, are also a huge problem in China, which over took the United States in 2007 to become the world’s biggest carbon dioxide emitter. Even with slightly lowered GDP growth targets, the country’s energy demands are set to skyrocket in the coming decades.

As Watts’ colleague Isabel Hilton noted:

The west invented unsustainable living; China has taken it up with enthusiasm.

We are barely three decades in to China’s industrial and consumption revolution. There are still hundreds of millions of poor Chinese who wish to prosper and consume in a country that wastes so much energy that its average per capita carbon emissions already equal those of France. The most worrying thing about the Chinese industrial revolution is not even the appalling damage that Watts meticulously chronicles, but the capacity for more that is still in the system.

“The good news is that government gets it,” says Watts, and is sincere because they are facing severe environmental crises and cannot avoid addressing them. But the solutions that are being put forth are engineered supply side solutions, like the massive South to North Water Transfer Project, which in many ways exhibits the same hubris as the expedition to save the Baiji.

China is now the world’s largest manufacturer of wind turbines and solar panels. Authorities aim for renewable sources to account for 8% of China’s energy supply by 2020. And even with the increase, two-thirds of Chinas’ energy supply will still come from coal (the remaining from nuclear and hydropower sources).

China has made huge investments in the clean tech sector (in fact, it was the country with the highest level of investment in the world in 2009) yet renewables will continue to represent just a fraction of China’s largely coal dominated energy mix.

Such investment and development strategies are ultimately band-aids to the underlying and much bigger problem identified by Watts, Western style consumption habits, which have readily been adopted by the Chinese. More consumption means greater energy and water demands, increased pollution, growing carbon dioxide emissions and fewer and fewer natural resources. “We may be approaching ecological limits to economic growth,” asserts Watts. “We [humans] resemble a swarm of locusts.” Pollution is not the biggest problem, because you can deal with pollution, what you cannot deal with is mankind’s widening appetite for “stuff” which is pushing the environment to its limits.

One of the constant arguments put forth by developing countries, particularly in relation to carbon emissions, is that they should be allowed to grow their economies without restrictions, just as developed countries did—the “develop now and clean up later” model. But this logic loses sight of the fact that we share one planet and finite resources. There may come a point in time at which the environment simply cannot support global consumption patterns. China, home to 1.3 billion people and “the world’s factory” is reaching that point. The extinction of the 20 million year old Baiji should serve as a cautionary tale of what happens when you push the environment beyond its healthy limits.

Permalink

GLENN BECK and MICHAEL MOORE AGREE: 10 Reminders for Republicans and Democrats

March 29th, 2010
From Bill Shireman, President of the Future 500:

Glenn Beck and Michael Moore agree on one thing: If we could just beat the Republicans AND the Democrats this November, maybe we’d have a shot at solving the enormous challenges we face.

But since that’s not likely, I would like to offer ten reminders to each party, to help them avoid some of the failings of their past and present.

(more…)

Permalink

Consumerism vs. Conservation – Is the Verdict in?

March 24th, 2010
From Juliette Terzieff, Senior Director, Global Stakeholder Initiatives:

It’s been a strange week for conservation efforts at the Conference on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES). Pessimists may argue world leaders have clearly demonstrated their lack of concern for our friends in the plant and animal kingdoms. Optimists will say some progress is better than none.

Either way you want to look at it, economic concerns have dominated the event with coral, sharks, polar bears, and Atlantic bluefin tuna among the species that failed to win protection support from delegates.

(more…)

Permalink

Jumping into bed after the Summit …

March 3rd, 2010
From Bill Shireman, Future 500 President:

The bipartisan summit on health care has already been dubbed a failure by party spinsters on both sides. But Americans are hungry for the integrative approach it symbolizes.

So am I. I resolve conflicts between political adversaries for a living. And I spend much of my blogging time attempting to crash conversations among true-believers on the right and left – the ones that demonize their favorite enemies as the source of all wrongdoing.

Whether you’re a Democrat, Republican, or Tea-totaler, it’s time for you to stop hanging out with mirrors, and crash those other parties too. To solve today’s challenges, we need strange political bedfellows, partisans willing to jump into the sack with one another, and bring their ideological codes together. That’s the only way to conceive smart and integrative solutions to the challenges we face.

(more…)

Permalink

One Voice, One Vote?

January 27th, 2010
From Erik Wohlgemuth, our VP of Strategic Operations:

The Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Citizens United vs. the Federal Election Commission significantly bolsters the rights of corporations, affirming and expanding a corporation’s individual rights to free speech in elections by removing spending limits on political campaigns.  While the same limits are removed for civil society groups like non-profits and unions, the disparity in spending between corporations and all others will likely deepen, enabling cash-rich companies to gain increasing access and influence over elected officials. 

(more…)

Permalink

Working Together

December 30th, 2009
From Juliette Terzieff, Senior Director, Global Stakeholder Initiatives:

Welcome to the Future 500 blog.

To start the New Year, we are delighted to launch the official Future 500 blog, where we invite you to join us in ongoing discussions, analysis and observations to advance the practice of stakeholder engagement in progressing systemic solutions to society’s critical sustainability challenges.

In the waning days of 2009 I find myself looking back on a tumultuous year full of critical events that affect all the world’s citizens.

Each of us has a stake in our collective future — a future that in 2009 continued to be endangered by global economic turmoil and international policy failures, increasing frequency of natural disasters, effects of climate change and decreasing availability of finite natural resources – to name just a few of the year’s challenges!

(more…)

Permalink