Archive for the ‘Scarcity & Supply Issues’ Category

Damon brings water to the bottom of the pyramid

December 7th, 2011
Posted by Senior Director, Juliette Terzieff:

Matt Damon may be most well-known for tackling serious roles in blockbusters like Good Will Hunting, Saving Private Ryan and The Departed but this Hollywood leading man has also emerged in recent years as a thought leader within the water sphere. Working with stakeholders across the spectrum Damon is helping to ensure people around the world have access to safe water and sanitation—setting a prime example of the power of multi-stakeholder efforts to provide systemic solutions to some of the world’s most pressing challenges.

(more…)

Permalink

What’s your water footprint?

November 30th, 2010

Posted by Pua Mench, Future 500 Manager for Stakeholder Engagement – Asia

In October I was fortunate to attend a Water Footprint Network (WFN) training course in Beijing, co-hosted by the Beijing Forestry University. I went for many reasons, not least of which is that it’s well documented that we are already facing a global water crisis. I truly believe water will be the environmental issue of our lifetime. As WFN’s aptly points out, “Water has a value but not a cost, it is a free good. This is a disincentive for efficient use. We need to have proper incentives to improve water use and decrease pollution.”

It is still early days for WFN, which was established just over two years ago. But the man behind the organization, Professor Arjen Hoekstra, has been hard at work on the water footprint concept since first introducing it in 2002. Hoekstra’s water footprint breaks from more traditional methods of water accounting in that it takes into account not only the direct water use of a consumer or producer, but also at the indirect water use.

Think of it this way—the amount of water you consumed this morning came not only from showering, brushing your teeth, using water to make a pot of coffee, etc. but also from the amount of water used to produce that coffee that you drank, or even the toothbrush that you used. Considering that the global average water footprint for just one cup of coffee is about 37 gallons, that’s a sizeable water footprint even before stepping out your front door.

On the product side of things, water footprinting is even more revealing, and has huge implications for companies in the business of producing, most anything. In the words of WFN, “The water footprint of a product is the volume of freshwater used to produce the product, measured over the full supply chain [emphasis added].  It is a multi-dimensional indicator, showing water consumption volumes by source and polluted volumes by type of pollution; all components of a total water footprint are specified geographically and temporally.”

According to WFN, many large companies in the beverage sector, for example SABMiller and Coca-cola, have looked at water use in the supply chain. The footprint of a supply chain is much larger than that of operations. Professor Hoekstra notes, “It is a big change for companies to understand this, as well as a big eye-opener.” Traditionally companies have thought about just direct withdrawals, whereas their water footprint has to do with consumptive water use.

I asked Professor Hoekstra if it’s realistic for companies with long and complex supply chains to measure their water footprint. He suggested that large companies should start by identifying a few suppliers with obvious water footprints. “Big companies need to put pressure on their suppliers. For a large company to say that they don’t know who their suppliers are is not an excuse,” said Hoekstra.

In 2009 SABMiller, in cooperation with WFN and World Wide Fund for Nature, became the first company to unveil a detailed corporate water footprint. As with most beverage companies, SABMiller found that the largest part of its water footprint is from crop cultivation, although this varies greatly from country to country, dependent upon water productivity. For example, the water used for agriculture is 150 liters per liter of beer in South Africa but just 55 in Peru. I’ll delve into the concept of water productivity further in a follow-up blog, as it’s central to sustainable water management.

Permalink

CSR Asia Summit – Embrace Innovation & Go Local

September 16th, 2010

Posted by Pua Mench, Future 500 Manager for Stakeholder Engagement – Asia

Day two of the CSR Asia Summit in Hong Kong saw the conference halls buzzing with activity.  My primary focus in the Asia region is water—a hot topic on many levels, and one that’s left some companies scratching their heads—so I made a beeline to the session entitled: “Water—the next carbon?” where Peter White, Director of Global Sustainability for Procter and Gamble (P&G), gave a compelling talk on the validity of this statement, and what P&G is doing about water.

The big difference between carbon and water, according to White, is that while carbon is global in scope “water is a local issue that occurs globally.” With carbon you can draw upon existing vetted methodologies to create a global carbon budget, as some organizations like World Wide Fund for Nature have done, you cannot simply add up water to create a global water budget.

P&G is taking a look at its entire water footprint, in part by using the World Business Council for Sustainable Development’s (WBCSD) Global Water Tool. P&G said that by far the largest component of their footprint is the water use attached to its products. To this end P&G is designing products that are both more efficient to manufacture and require less water for end-use, like “Ariel” and “Downy One Rinse.”

Discussion around local challenges and solutions for resource use was not limited to water. Graham Clewer, Director of Ethical Trade for the Body Shop International, made a point to emphasize local engagement during a lively session on sustainable ingredients. “If you do not manage ingredients on the local level you will have problems,“ said Clewer. “Body Shop reaches out and constantly addresses a vast network of NGOs.”

One thing that’s struck me at this conference is the innovation springing forth from companies facing ever-increasing external pressure to be sustainable. Granted CSR conferences tend to be a bit of a corporate love-in, it is inspiring to hear so many stories of lemonade being made of lemons—and P&G is far from the only one doing so. At the end of the day many are discovering it’s just plain good business sense to run cleaner, leaner and greener operations.

Graham Clewer perhaps put it best, “What we used to see as risk we now see as value.”

The business argument for sustainability is something the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) understands well. And when Adam Tomasek, director of WWF’s Heart of Borneo Initiative, addressed this topic I was very happy to (finally) hear an NGO-voice.

Tomasek described how WWF collaborated with Cargill to look at the economics of palm oil production at plantations. Their research showed that companies are able to produce sustainable palm oil at the same cost as unsustainable palm oil, minus all of the social and environmental issues attached—essentially making it “cheaper” to produce sustainable palm oil. Backed by research and a corporate partner, WWF now has the confidence to engage with companies globally.

The session moderator, who sits on the Roundtable of the Sustainable Palm Oil in Malaysia, observed that even though companies are willing to work with NGOs no “real” partnerships exist in the palm oil sector and present relationships are “weak.”  – an observation that points to a tremendous opportunity to both sides to develop meaningful and productive relationships.

Genevieve Hilton of the German chemical company BASF, reminded companies to carefully consider what is meant by “greener” when responding to external pressure. She advised the audience to not just depend on what’s visible to the consumer when assessing environmental impact, and that in the long-run it’s “better to be influenced by the latest science and not the latest trend.” Comparing the eco-impact of product x versus product y is often more complex than one would assume.

The BASF presentation also included the following: “when you talk about how green a product is you need to consider how green compared to what? What are the alternatives?” A valid point but also a sensitive topic, as one member of the audience, representing the NGO-sector, offered: “Bad is still bad, even if there is no immediate better solution.”

Permalink

Thoughts from the CSR Asia Summit

September 15th, 2010

Posted by Pua Mench, Future 500 Manager for Stakeholder Engagement – Asia

The 8th annual CSR Asia Summit kicked off Tuesday, Sept. 14 in Hong Kong, engaging 400 participants from 25 countries on an array of issues centered on “strategic solutions for sustainability.” Across Asia “CS-who?” is a common response when someone begins to raise sustainability issues to a corporate audience, so the sellout crowd here at the summit is an exciting signal of a growing profile for CSR issues.

There is a long way to go. Even in the very westernized and very wealthy Hong Kong, 86% of companies either do not know what CSR is or do not know what to do about it.  And as a fellow participant from Singapore shared with me later, that number is about the same in her country.

Mark Dickens, Head of Listing for the Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (HKex), suggested that cultural differences are part of the problem. Dickens says that the language used by people in the West to discuss CSR issues with Asia is often perceived as patronizing. He advocated more collaborative efforts as a way forward, for example engaging in conversations and sharing ideas, such as exemplified by the model of the Equator Principles. “A process of inclusion rather than preaching process makes a lot more sense,” said Dickens.

**********************

 

At a breakout session on the role of business in achieving the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) in Asia, UNICEF’s regional chief David Girling discussed progress in the region and business opportunities presented by the MDGs. Girling said there is untapped potential for private sector, particularly between now and 2015, as business can leverage government pressure to achieve the MDGs.

He offered a few exciting examples of business capitalizing on the MDGs—illustrating a point echoed throughout the day, “CSR is NOT about philanthropy.” For example, India’s Tata—a frontrunner on many levels, including CSR—has developed a low-cost water purifier targeted at low-income groups and rural markets, in an effort to both save the lives of millions who suffer from waterborne diseases and make a profit. The Vietnam-based International Development Enterprises (IDE) is helping to eradicate disease by providing commercial rural latrines. Girling said that innovation of this nature is a huge growth area.

Toby Ernberg, global corporate accounts manager of Vestergaard Frandsen, followed up on this idea, with examples of his company’s own ability to innovate. Vestergaard Frandsen develops products that save lives, are easy to use and long lasting. They are the leading producer of insecticide treated bed nets, the most effective known device for preventing malaria in the developing world. I was particularly impressed by Vestergaard Frandsen’s “Life Straw” product, which is aptly named as it looks exactly like a big straw, albeit much enhanced. The life straw filters up to 1,000 liters of water, removing most waterborne bacteria and parasites.

What I found particularly inspiring about Vestergaard Frandsen is that they adhere to strict CSR principles—they walk the walk, as was made obvious when Ernberg spoke with pride about the trip the entire staff took to Kenya to test the rural poor for AIDS and malaria and offer counseling, medicine and other helpful materials.

Ernberg’s last comment summed up the session nicely, and offered a powerful insight, “Most companies focus on just 10% of the population when developing products, whereas my company focuses on those 90% that need products.”

Note: For those companies wishing to learn more about the MDGs, and gain insight into their current impact/contribution, the Netherlands-based National Committee for International Cooperation and Sustainable Development has devised an online tool, the “MDG scan.” www.mdgscan.com/ 

**********************

 

In the afternoon discussion turned to climate change adaptation, not an entirely uplifting topic but a critical one none-the-less.

A two-pronged conversation emerged, the urgency for action coupled with the confusion among companies over what to do.

Dr. Glen Frommer, Head of Sustainability Department for Hong Kong’s MTR corporation, had this to offer to business, as a way to manage the risks presented by climate change, “As long as companies have a transparent, robust system in place, and trust is in place, they should move forward by taking it one step at a time.” ‘Do so with urgency’ was the silent caveat.

Frommer also encouraged participants to accelerate the realization that climate change will impact rich and poor alike. “What’s happening in Pakistan [the lethal flooding] is going to happen again and again. We are one people with one goal, and not much time to get there.”

I wrapped up the day participating in a discussion on innovative solutions for sustainable value chains. The moderator kicked the discussion off with an insightful remark, “Where the value chain stops is increasingly expanding.” Indeed.  We’re seeing this in China right now, where NGOs are increasingly scrutinizing MNCs’ supply chains, and holding them accountable for suppliers to the nth-tier.

For a company like Proctor and Gamble (the first to present), which has 75,000 suppliers, this is no easy task. One way they are tackling the issue is through their “supplier sustainability board,” which launched P&G’s “supplier environmental scorecard” in May 2010. P&G asks suppliers to report on carbon emissions, wastes and other environmental and social indicators. They also encourage suppliers to bring forward their innovations and ideas, which, if successful, are recognized and rewarded.

Permalink

Polluted Costs of China’s Growth

September 13th, 2010

by Pua Mench, Manager, Stakeholder Engagement – Asia

In August China overtook Japan to become the world’s second-largest economy. Its economy has grown at an average rate of more than 9.5% annually for the past 28 years — four times the rate of first world economies — and lifting 300 million people out of poverty.

The bad news is that much of China’s economic growth has come at the cost of the environment—and perhaps nowhere is the toxic fallout of China’s growth more evident—or  threatening— than in the deterioration of its water resources.

Consider the following statistics, as reported by the Hong Kong-based Asia Water Project:  


(more…)

Permalink

Consensus Emerges at Stockholm World Water Week

September 9th, 2010

Discussions at the Stockholm World Water Week continue to reveal broad consensus on many water-related issues and the immediate need to address them. This guest post from attendee EcoMundi CEO Alex McIntosh, provides valuable insights in the the thinking of thought leaders on water ….

***********************

Reporting real time on Day 4 of World Water Week:  Stockholm, Sweden (9/9/10)

 (posted by Alex McIntosh, founder, Ecomundi Ventures)

By Day Four of the 2,500-attendee conference, a few overarching themes have begun to emerge.  First, in the majority of the watersheds across the globe, we know too little about the amount of water available, the amount extracted in aggregate for human use, or the quality of the watershed.  For this reason, in the seminar On the Road the Corporate Water Reporting, panelists from Nature Conservancy, CERES, Quantis, PepsiCo, CH2M HILL, Unilever, Borealis and other organizations all agreed that the trend towards greater water reporting transparency would continue, primarily driven by businesses’ need to obtain and manage their supply chain water resources, and in response to consumer/customer/investor stakeholder pressure. 

(more…)

Permalink

Can Crisis Secure the Right to Water?

September 9th, 2010

 

What comes to mind when you think about water?

Perhaps a swim in the pool on a hot day, ice cubes in your favorite drink or the relaxation of a long, hot shower after a tough day at work.

Well what if you could have none of those things? What if water – and the necessity of its use – translated into stomach cramps …diarrhea …malnutrition …death?

For 884 million people a source of safe drinking water is unavailable, according to UNICEF, and for 2.5 billion people there is no access to clean sanitation.

Over 3 million people a year die as a result of water-borne diseases. In the time it took me to type that sentence, a child died from lack of clean water.

On July 28 the United Nations General Assembly passed a nonbinding resolution affirming access to clean water and sanitation as fundamental human rights – that means that every, single human being on the planet should be able to raise a glass without fear of getting cholera.

Make it a reality is a huge challenge.

(more…)

Permalink

Today World Water Day, Tomorrow What?

March 22nd, 2010
From Matt Turner, Director, Global Stakeholder Initiative, Water Program:

Today, we commemorate World Water Day, the annual day designated by the United Nations to raise awareness to the severe global freshwater access and quality challenges. Here in North America and abroad there are a number of events taking place in support of this year’s global theme to promote “support for safe, affordable and sustainable drinking water, sanitation and hygiene worldwide.”

It’s a day when there appears to be coordination and agreement among many of the key players on the need to advance awareness to what may very well be the dominant environmental and social issue of the 21st Century.

(more…)

Permalink

Lake Tai: Opportunity to Create a Water Blueprint?

February 5th, 2010
From Matt Turner, Director, Global Stakeholder Initiatives, Water Program:

I traveled recently to Nanjing, China to participate in a multi-national, multi-stakeholder working group, hosted by the Woodrow Wilson Center, Japanese Institute of Developing Economics (IDE-JETRO), and Nanjing University, on “Building New Clean Water Networks in China:  Challenges and Opportunities for Protecting Lake Tai,” the third largest freshwater body in the country. 

En route I couldn’t help but gawk from the window of my train plying from Shanghai to Nanjing at the explosive growth of Jiangsu’s infrastructure, factories and supporting facilities, even through the thick film of lingering smog.  There seemed to be a continuous string of factories, overpasses, underpasses, bridges and factory towns, with 10 and 12 story buildings grouped so tightly they were almost impossible to count.  Experiencing first-hand the scope, pace and commitment to growth is truly an eye opening and mind-boggling experience.

(more…)

Permalink

Good To The Last Drop – Water & Climate Stakeholders Unite

January 12th, 2010
From Erik Wohlgemuth, our VP of Strategic Operations:

In the U.S. during the Bush administration, we saw a significant reduction in federal funding for water infrastructure and for enforcement of clean water standards.  As often happens, the NGO sector mobilized to fill the void left by government, to raise awareness of worsening infrastructure and poor enforcement. 

Citizen suits were filed against the most newsworthy corporate and municipal violators.  Activist NGOs mobilized and joined forces with shareholders and mainstream environmental advocacy groups to mount campaigns against brand-name companies, effectively influencing perceptions of the media, consumers and regulators. 

(more…)

Permalink