Posts Tagged ‘Climate’

Watts, Water and the power of a Billion Chinese Jump

March 28th, 2011

From Pua Mench, Director of Stakeholder Engagement, Asia:

At a recent talk Jonathan Watts, Asia environment correspondent for The Guardian and author of “When a Billion Chinese Jump: How China will Save Mankind – Or Destroy It”, gave disturbing summary of China’s environmental performance – and expressed hope for our collective future.

Watts’ book provides a poignant and informative glimpse into China’s deteriorating environment, from Yunnan Province to Inner Mongolia, which Watts playfully describes as a guide of places not to go. Watts, who is based in Beijing and has spent the past seven years in China, is frank but fair when describing the situation in China. He gives cautious praise to the country’s 12th Five-Year Plan, released in March 14, 2011 and says he is encouraged by the plan, which for the first time ever slightly reduces the pace of economic growth and expands the list of pollution targets. “Government is starting to recognize that there are finite limits on how far you can push the environment,” says Watts. But it remains to be seen whether or not government efforts will improve the situation.

Until a river expedition in search of the Baiji, or Yangtze River Dolphin – one of only five freshwater dolphin species in the world – Watts said he assumed that when mankind wholeheartedly turns his attention to problems he could fix them. The Baiji expedition represented such efforts. Well funded and with cutting edge technology and a leading team of scientists, the journey was forecast to be a success, yet not a single dolphin was found. At the trip’s end a creature that had been on earth for twenty million years was declared functionally extinct, most likely due to environmental stress caused by pollution, river traffic, dams and illegal fishing. Watts regards that story as the most important one he’ll ever write, one that powerfully illustrates the limits of human capability and irreversible and grave consequences of our actions.

In response to the apparent demise of the Baiji, Indian authorities announced plans earlier this year to make extraordinary efforts to save the country’s remaining population of the endangered Ganges river dolphin – of which authorities estimate less than 3,000 remain in the wild. 

Unfortunately, the deeper meaning behind tragedies like the demise of the Baiji is often lost, especially in China where 300 million people live without access to clean water supplies. “Water quality and quantity is by far the biggest concern in China,” says to Watts. Fifty percent of China’s water is not fit for human consumption and another third to a quarter is not fit for any use whatsoever, according to Ministry of Environmental Protection research. Air pollution and carbon dioxide emissions, largely stemming from coal-fired power plants, are also a huge problem in China, which over took the United States in 2007 to become the world’s biggest carbon dioxide emitter. Even with slightly lowered GDP growth targets, the country’s energy demands are set to skyrocket in the coming decades.

As Watts’ colleague Isabel Hilton noted:

The west invented unsustainable living; China has taken it up with enthusiasm.

We are barely three decades in to China’s industrial and consumption revolution. There are still hundreds of millions of poor Chinese who wish to prosper and consume in a country that wastes so much energy that its average per capita carbon emissions already equal those of France. The most worrying thing about the Chinese industrial revolution is not even the appalling damage that Watts meticulously chronicles, but the capacity for more that is still in the system.

“The good news is that government gets it,” says Watts, and is sincere because they are facing severe environmental crises and cannot avoid addressing them. But the solutions that are being put forth are engineered supply side solutions, like the massive South to North Water Transfer Project, which in many ways exhibits the same hubris as the expedition to save the Baiji.

China is now the world’s largest manufacturer of wind turbines and solar panels. Authorities aim for renewable sources to account for 8% of China’s energy supply by 2020. And even with the increase, two-thirds of Chinas’ energy supply will still come from coal (the remaining from nuclear and hydropower sources).

China has made huge investments in the clean tech sector (in fact, it was the country with the highest level of investment in the world in 2009) yet renewables will continue to represent just a fraction of China’s largely coal dominated energy mix.

Such investment and development strategies are ultimately band-aids to the underlying and much bigger problem identified by Watts, Western style consumption habits, which have readily been adopted by the Chinese. More consumption means greater energy and water demands, increased pollution, growing carbon dioxide emissions and fewer and fewer natural resources. “We may be approaching ecological limits to economic growth,” asserts Watts. “We [humans] resemble a swarm of locusts.” Pollution is not the biggest problem, because you can deal with pollution, what you cannot deal with is mankind’s widening appetite for “stuff” which is pushing the environment to its limits.

One of the constant arguments put forth by developing countries, particularly in relation to carbon emissions, is that they should be allowed to grow their economies without restrictions, just as developed countries did—the “develop now and clean up later” model. But this logic loses sight of the fact that we share one planet and finite resources. There may come a point in time at which the environment simply cannot support global consumption patterns. China, home to 1.3 billion people and “the world’s factory” is reaching that point. The extinction of the 20 million year old Baiji should serve as a cautionary tale of what happens when you push the environment beyond its healthy limits.

Permalink

What’s your water footprint?

November 30th, 2010

Posted by Pua Mench, Future 500 Manager for Stakeholder Engagement – Asia

In October I was fortunate to attend a Water Footprint Network (WFN) training course in Beijing, co-hosted by the Beijing Forestry University. I went for many reasons, not least of which is that it’s well documented that we are already facing a global water crisis. I truly believe water will be the environmental issue of our lifetime. As WFN’s aptly points out, “Water has a value but not a cost, it is a free good. This is a disincentive for efficient use. We need to have proper incentives to improve water use and decrease pollution.”

It is still early days for WFN, which was established just over two years ago. But the man behind the organization, Professor Arjen Hoekstra, has been hard at work on the water footprint concept since first introducing it in 2002. Hoekstra’s water footprint breaks from more traditional methods of water accounting in that it takes into account not only the direct water use of a consumer or producer, but also at the indirect water use.

Think of it this way—the amount of water you consumed this morning came not only from showering, brushing your teeth, using water to make a pot of coffee, etc. but also from the amount of water used to produce that coffee that you drank, or even the toothbrush that you used. Considering that the global average water footprint for just one cup of coffee is about 37 gallons, that’s a sizeable water footprint even before stepping out your front door.

On the product side of things, water footprinting is even more revealing, and has huge implications for companies in the business of producing, most anything. In the words of WFN, “The water footprint of a product is the volume of freshwater used to produce the product, measured over the full supply chain [emphasis added].  It is a multi-dimensional indicator, showing water consumption volumes by source and polluted volumes by type of pollution; all components of a total water footprint are specified geographically and temporally.”

According to WFN, many large companies in the beverage sector, for example SABMiller and Coca-cola, have looked at water use in the supply chain. The footprint of a supply chain is much larger than that of operations. Professor Hoekstra notes, “It is a big change for companies to understand this, as well as a big eye-opener.” Traditionally companies have thought about just direct withdrawals, whereas their water footprint has to do with consumptive water use.

I asked Professor Hoekstra if it’s realistic for companies with long and complex supply chains to measure their water footprint. He suggested that large companies should start by identifying a few suppliers with obvious water footprints. “Big companies need to put pressure on their suppliers. For a large company to say that they don’t know who their suppliers are is not an excuse,” said Hoekstra.

In 2009 SABMiller, in cooperation with WFN and World Wide Fund for Nature, became the first company to unveil a detailed corporate water footprint. As with most beverage companies, SABMiller found that the largest part of its water footprint is from crop cultivation, although this varies greatly from country to country, dependent upon water productivity. For example, the water used for agriculture is 150 liters per liter of beer in South Africa but just 55 in Peru. I’ll delve into the concept of water productivity further in a follow-up blog, as it’s central to sustainable water management.

Permalink

Politics as Usual Leaves America Behind in the Global Climate Debate

January 18th, 2010
From Danna Moore, our Stakeholder Campaigns Director:

Americans are less supportive of climate change action than people in other countries. This disconnect makes it unlikely the U.S. will pass meaningful policy before the next international meeting and American politicians need to assume more of a leadership role.

It is clear that worldwide support for serious action on climate change remains robust even during a global recession.  A recent Globescan Survey polled over 24,000 individuals in 23 countries and found that 64% of people think climate change is a “very serious” problem, up from 44% of those polled in 1998. 

Sadly, Americans ranked below the average with 45%, a decrease from 50% in 2007. This has left the scientific and environmental community confused on the next steps towards addressing climate change in the United States. Scientists find they must, once again, expend time and resources to fight climate change skepticism rather than focus on the political solutions that are desperately needed.

(more…)

Permalink

Good To The Last Drop – Water & Climate Stakeholders Unite

January 12th, 2010
From Erik Wohlgemuth, our VP of Strategic Operations:

In the U.S. during the Bush administration, we saw a significant reduction in federal funding for water infrastructure and for enforcement of clean water standards.  As often happens, the NGO sector mobilized to fill the void left by government, to raise awareness of worsening infrastructure and poor enforcement. 

Citizen suits were filed against the most newsworthy corporate and municipal violators.  Activist NGOs mobilized and joined forces with shareholders and mainstream environmental advocacy groups to mount campaigns against brand-name companies, effectively influencing perceptions of the media, consumers and regulators. 

(more…)

Permalink

Working Together

December 30th, 2009
From Juliette Terzieff, Senior Director, Global Stakeholder Initiatives:

Welcome to the Future 500 blog.

To start the New Year, we are delighted to launch the official Future 500 blog, where we invite you to join us in ongoing discussions, analysis and observations to advance the practice of stakeholder engagement in progressing systemic solutions to society’s critical sustainability challenges.

In the waning days of 2009 I find myself looking back on a tumultuous year full of critical events that affect all the world’s citizens.

Each of us has a stake in our collective future — a future that in 2009 continued to be endangered by global economic turmoil and international policy failures, increasing frequency of natural disasters, effects of climate change and decreasing availability of finite natural resources – to name just a few of the year’s challenges!

(more…)

Permalink